tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post2258476748759866163..comments2023-05-10T17:32:28.225+02:00Comments on The Beez' speaks..: Of ripples in a pondThe Beez'http://www.blogger.com/profile/14718864828133872589noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post-19500970621710883252011-09-24T21:33:21.873+02:002011-09-24T21:33:21.873+02:00Thank you a lot for leaving a link to this post on...Thank you a lot for leaving a link to this post on my blog. It was very helpful. Things have changed a lot in the six years it's been since I picked up blogging again. People used to be respectful, but I guess it isn't that way any more. Anyways, it was a good read. :) I have to do some thinking on whether or not I want to continue blogging. On one hand, I feel it is a creative outlet that allows me to explore and connect with others (which is why I allow comments in the first place). On the other hand, it's became one gigantic pain in the *ss to deal with all the trolls and flames I get. So I have some decision making to do. Here's a hint though: your post made me feel a lot better about going ahead and doing it, not caring what anyone thinks.Jonquil McDanielhttp://xjonquilx.co.ccnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post-15635310774847439052010-01-17T14:26:39.454+01:002010-01-17T14:26:39.454+01:00@Anonymous
Remains it is not on issue.@Anonymous<br />Remains it is not on issue.The Beez'https://www.blogger.com/profile/14718864828133872589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post-52151720234220258542010-01-17T13:46:52.257+01:002010-01-17T13:46:52.257+01:00An ad hominem argument has the basic form:
Person ...An ad hominem argument has the basic form:<br />Person 1 makes claim X<br />There is something objectionable about Person 1<br />Therefore claim X is false<br /><br />An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument toward the person" or "argument against the person") is an argument which links the validity of a premise to an irrelevant characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.[1]Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post-40257826474617398092010-01-17T13:35:21.431+01:002010-01-17T13:35:21.431+01:00an ad hominem attack must replace substantive argu...an ad hominem attack must replace substantive argument with irrelevant personal attack. I suggest you are using an incorrectly broad definition of what is a precisely defined rhetorical construct.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post-56440385613571503852010-01-17T13:29:24.214+01:002010-01-17T13:29:24.214+01:00how can you have an ad hominem attack when you spe...how can you have an ad hominem attack when you specifically don't name an individual and you cast the entire statement intentionally to be as generic as possible?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post-37631453824452478932010-01-17T10:11:18.397+01:002010-01-17T10:11:18.397+01:00@Comment deleted
- Violation of ad hominem attack
...@Comment deleted<br />- Violation of ad hominem attack<br />- Violation of "stay on issue".The Beez'https://www.blogger.com/profile/14718864828133872589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post-31301195552386184752010-01-17T05:13:14.946+01:002010-01-17T05:13:14.946+01:00"Does a vicar have the right to visit a titty..."Does a vicar have the right to visit a titty bar?" YES! As long as he doesn't berate anyone who is doing the same thing. Turnabout is fair play. Judge not lest you be judged.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post-38373968461811880912010-01-16T21:31:09.242+01:002010-01-16T21:31:09.242+01:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3813856659277593071.post-28985471154583757632010-01-16T19:47:52.382+01:002010-01-16T19:47:52.382+01:00a comment Bruce Byfield refused to print on his la...a comment Bruce Byfield refused to print on his latest entry that you reference:<br /><br />"Bruce, do you feel that any set of circumstances ever justifies publishing non public and shadily acquired nude photos of a person you dislike or disagree with? Is this ever possibly right, ethical or moral?"<br /><br />(paraphrase)<br /><br />Bruce would not address this issue.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com